What are the chances of seeing a Brown Fish-Owl in Gir National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Brown Fish-Owl sighting in Gir National Park on a given day, based on 38 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 71st most-seen of the 135 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Brown Fish-Owl in Gir National Park?
March
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Brown Fish-Owl in Gir National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, the lowest month. That is one of Gir National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 330 mm in July. July and August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Brown Fish-Owl?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Brown Fish-Owl sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Gir National Park the best place to see a Brown Fish-Owl?
4th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Brown Fish-Owl sightings, Gir National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Wilpattu National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%), Ranthambore National Park (India, about 20%) and Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Brown Fish-Owl live in Gir National Park?
Same family: Strigidae
The closest relatives of the Brown Fish-Owl that you can see in Gir National Park (family Strigidae, Typical Owls) are Indian Scops-Owl (about 30%), Spotted Owlet (about 30%) and Mottled Wood Owl (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Brown Fish-Owl sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Brown Fish-Owl is recorded against all the birds logged in Gir National Park (38 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.