What are the chances of seeing a Paddle-Tailed Darner in Great Bear Rainforest?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Paddle-Tailed Darner sighting in Great Bear Rainforest on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 235 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Paddle-Tailed Darner in Great Bear Rainforest?
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Paddle-Tailed Darner in Great Bear Rainforest on a given day, against under 5% in October to June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Paddle-Tailed Darner?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Paddle-Tailed Darner sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Great Bear Rainforest the best place to see a Paddle-Tailed Darner?
Among the best
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Paddle-Tailed Darner sightings, Great Bear Rainforest ranks 5th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Rocky Mountain National Park (United States, about 10%), Grand Teton National Park (United States, about 10%) and Glacier National Park (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Paddle-Tailed Darner live in Great Bear Rainforest?
Same genus: Aeshna
The closest relatives of the Paddle-Tailed Darner that you can see in Great Bear Rainforest (genus Aeshna, Hawkers and Typical Darners) are Zigzag Darner (about 10%), Subarctic Darner (about 10%) and Lake Darner (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Paddle-Tailed Darner sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Paddle-Tailed Darner is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Bear Rainforest (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.