What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Eyed Darner in Great Bear Rainforest?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Eyed Darner sighting in Great Bear Rainforest on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 178th most-seen of the 235 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Eyed Darner in Great Bear Rainforest?
July
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Eyed Darner in Great Bear Rainforest on a given day, against under 5% in August to June, the lowest months. That is one of Great Bear Rainforest's driest months, with about 120 mm of rain against 480 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Eyed Darner?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Eyed Darner sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Great Bear Rainforest the best place to see a Blue-Eyed Darner?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Blue-Eyed Darner sightings, Great Bear Rainforest ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Channel Islands National Park (United States, about 10%), Death Valley National Park (United States, about 10%) and Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (United States, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Blue-Eyed Darner live in Great Bear Rainforest?
Same family: Aeshnidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-Eyed Darner that you can see in Great Bear Rainforest (family Aeshnidae, Darners) are Paddle-Tailed Darner (about 10%), Zigzag Darner (about 10%) and Subarctic Darner (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Eyed Darner sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Eyed Darner is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Bear Rainforest (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.