What are the chances of seeing a Leistarcha scitissimella in Great Otway National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Leistarcha scitissimella sighting in Great Otway National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 286th most-seen of the 418 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Leistarcha scitissimella in Great Otway National Park?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Leistarcha scitissimella in Great Otway National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Leistarcha scitissimella?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Leistarcha scitissimella sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Great Otway National Park the best place to see a Leistarcha scitissimella?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Leistarcha scitissimella sightings, Great Otway National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Leistarcha scitissimella live in Great Otway National Park?
Same family: Xyloryctidae
The closest relatives of the Leistarcha scitissimella that you can see in Great Otway National Park (family Xyloryctidae, Timber Moths) are Cryptophasa irrorata (about 10%) and Fruit Tree Borer (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Leistarcha scitissimella sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Leistarcha scitissimella is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Otway National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.