What are the chances of seeing a Chrysopilus connexus in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chrysopilus connexus sighting in Great Smoky Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 202nd most-seen of the 822 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chrysopilus connexus in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chrysopilus connexus in Great Smoky Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chrysopilus connexus?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chrysopilus connexus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see a Chrysopilus connexus?
Only Great Smoky Mountains National Park, in our data
Great Smoky Mountains National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Chrysopilus connexus sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Chrysopilus connexus live in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
Same genus: Chrysopilus
The closest relatives of the Chrysopilus connexus that you can see in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (genus Chrysopilus) are Quadrate Snipe Fly (about 10%), Golden-Backed Snipe Fly (about 10%) and Chrysopilus davisi (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chrysopilus connexus sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chrysopilus connexus is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.