What are the chances of seeing a Purple-Lined Sallow in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Purple-Lined Sallow sighting in Great Smoky Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 628th most-seen of the 822 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Purple-Lined Sallow in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
May and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Purple-Lined Sallow in Great Smoky Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and August–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Purple-Lined Sallow?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Purple-Lined Sallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Where else can you see a Purple-Lined Sallow?
Only Great Smoky Mountains National Park, in our data
Great Smoky Mountains National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Purple-Lined Sallow sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Purple-Lined Sallow live in Great Smoky Mountains National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Purple-Lined Sallow that you can see in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Beautiful Wood-Nymph (about 20%), Hebrew Moth (about 10%) and American Dagger (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Purple-Lined Sallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Purple-Lined Sallow is recorded against all the insects logged in Great Smoky Mountains National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.