What are the chances of seeing a Macrocheraia grandis in Gunung Leuser National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Macrocheraia grandis sighting in Gunung Leuser National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 82nd most-seen of the 103 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Macrocheraia grandis in Gunung Leuser National Park?
January
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Macrocheraia grandis in Gunung Leuser National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, May and July–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Macrocheraia grandis?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Macrocheraia grandis sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gunung Leuser National Park the best place to see a Macrocheraia grandis?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Macrocheraia grandis sightings, Gunung Leuser National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 40%), Kaziranga National Park (India, about 40%) and Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Macrocheraia grandis live in Gunung Leuser National Park?
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Macrocheraia grandis that you can see in Gunung Leuser National Park (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Pyrops pythicus (about 30%), Pyrops ruehli (about 30%) and Megapomponia pendleburyi (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Macrocheraia grandis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Macrocheraia grandis is recorded against all the insects logged in Gunung Leuser National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.