What are the chances of seeing a Phimenes flavopictus in Gunung Leuser National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Phimenes flavopictus sighting in Gunung Leuser National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 56th most-seen of the 103 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Phimenes flavopictus in Gunung Leuser National Park?
November
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Phimenes flavopictus in Gunung Leuser National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August–October and December–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Phimenes flavopictus?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Phimenes flavopictus sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Gunung Leuser National Park the best place to see a Phimenes flavopictus?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Phimenes flavopictus sightings, Gunung Leuser National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Taroko National Park (Taiwan, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Phimenes flavopictus live in Gunung Leuser National Park?
Same order: Hymenoptera
The closest relatives of the Phimenes flavopictus that you can see in Gunung Leuser National Park (order Hymenoptera, Ants, Bees, Wasps, and Sawflies) are Broad-Handed Carpenter Bee (about 30%), Giant Honey Bee (about 10%) and Camponotus festinus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Phimenes flavopictus sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Phimenes flavopictus is recorded against all the insects logged in Gunung Leuser National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.