What are the chances of seeing a Common Owl Moth in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Common Owl Moth sighting in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 109th most-seen of the 296 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Owl Moth in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Owl Moth in Kaeng Krachan National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June–July and September–October, the lowest months. That is one of Kaeng Krachan National Park's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain against 30 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Common Owl Moth?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Owl Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Kaeng Krachan National Park the best place to see a Common Owl Moth?
2nd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Common Owl Moth sightings, Kaeng Krachan National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Common Owl Moth live in Kaeng Krachan National Park?
Same genus: Erebus
The closest relatives of the Common Owl Moth that you can see in Kaeng Krachan National Park (genus Erebus) are White-Barred Owl Moth (about 10%) and Erebus caprimulgus (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Owl Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Owl Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Kaeng Krachan National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.