What are the chances of seeing a Malabar Whistling-Thrush in Kanha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Malabar Whistling-Thrush sighting in Kanha National Park on a given day, based on 60 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 202nd most-seen of the 286 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Malabar Whistling-Thrush in Kanha National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Malabar Whistling-Thrush in Kanha National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Malabar Whistling-Thrush?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Malabar Whistling-Thrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kanha National Park the best place to see a Malabar Whistling-Thrush?
7th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Malabar Whistling-Thrush sightings, Kanha National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Periyar National Park (India, about 60%), Eravikulam National Park (India, about 50%) and Mudumalai National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Malabar Whistling-Thrush live in Kanha National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Malabar Whistling-Thrush that you can see in Kanha National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Oriental Magpie-Robin (about 60%), Tickell's Blue Flycatcher (about 40%) and White-rumped Shama (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Malabar Whistling-Thrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Malabar Whistling-Thrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Kanha National Park (60 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.