What are the chances of seeing a Sumatran Babbler in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Sumatran Babbler sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 190th most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Sumatran Babbler in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
March
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sumatran Babbler in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and April–December, the lowest months. January has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Sumatran Babbler?
Between 1 and 4 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sumatran Babbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Sumatran Babbler?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Sumatran Babbler sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 40%) and Gunung Leuser National Park (Indonesia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Sumatran Babbler live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same family: Pellorneidae
The closest relatives of the Sumatran Babbler that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (family Pellorneidae, Ground Babblers and Allies) are Rusty-breasted Wren-Babbler (about 30%), Eyebrowed Wren-Babbler (about 20%) and Horsfield's Babbler (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Sumatran Babbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sumatran Babbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.