What are the chances of seeing a Brown-cheeked Fulvetta in Khao Sok National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Brown-cheeked Fulvetta sighting in Khao Sok National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 145th most-seen of the 213 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Brown-cheeked Fulvetta in Khao Sok National Park?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Brown-cheeked Fulvetta in Khao Sok National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Brown-cheeked Fulvetta?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Brown-cheeked Fulvetta sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Sok National Park the best place to see a Brown-cheeked Fulvetta?
8th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Brown-cheeked Fulvetta sightings, Khao Sok National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kanha National Park (India, about 40%), Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 30%) and Periyar National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Brown-cheeked Fulvetta live in Khao Sok National Park?
Same family: Pellorneidae
The closest relatives of the Brown-cheeked Fulvetta that you can see in Khao Sok National Park (family Pellorneidae, Ground Babblers and Allies) are Abbott's Babbler (about 20%) and Puff-throated Babbler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Brown-cheeked Fulvetta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Brown-cheeked Fulvetta is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Sok National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.