Callitettix versicolor
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaeng Krachan National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 2 | Khao Sok National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 3 | Cat Tien National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 4 | Khao Yai National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuen Mun | 🇨🇳 China | |
| 2 | Changsha | 🇨🇳 China | |
| 3 | Ho Chi Minh City | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 4 | Mumbai | 🇮🇳 India |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Sugarcane Spittlebug sighting in Khao Sok National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 36th most-seen of the 104 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
December
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Sugarcane Spittlebug in Khao Sok National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March and July–November, the lowest months.
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sugarcane Spittlebug sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Sugarcane Spittlebug sightings, Khao Sok National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 20%).
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Sugarcane Spittlebug that you can see in Khao Sok National Park (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Red-Nosed Lanternfly (about 40%), Penthicodes variegata (about 10%) and Penthicodes atomaria (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sugarcane Spittlebug is recorded against all the insects logged in Khao Sok National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
