What are the chances of seeing an Asian Sapphire Flutterer in Khao Yai National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Asian Sapphire Flutterer sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 183rd most-seen of the 221 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Asian Sapphire Flutterer in Khao Yai National Park?
May–June, August and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Asian Sapphire Flutterer in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, July, September and November–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Asian Sapphire Flutterer?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Asian Sapphire Flutterer sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Khao Yai National Park the best place to see an Asian Sapphire Flutterer?
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Asian Sapphire Flutterer sightings, Khao Yai National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Sepilok (Malaysia, about 20%), Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 10%) and Sinharaja Forest Reserve (Sri Lanka, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Asian Sapphire Flutterer live in Khao Yai National Park?
Same genus: Rhyothemis
The closest relatives of the Asian Sapphire Flutterer that you can see in Khao Yai National Park (genus Rhyothemis, Flutterers) are Common Picture Wing (about 10%) and Greater Bluewing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Asian Sapphire Flutterer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Asian Sapphire Flutterer is recorded against all the insects logged in Khao Yai National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.