What are the chances of seeing a Common Flangetail in Khao Yai National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Common Flangetail sighting in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 49th most-seen of the 221 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Flangetail in Khao Yai National Park?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Common Flangetail in Khao Yai National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September and November–February, the lowest months. That is one of Khao Yai National Park's wettest months, with about 260 mm of rain against 15 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Common Flangetail?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Flangetail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Khao Yai National Park the best place to see a Common Flangetail?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Common Flangetail sightings, Khao Yai National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 20%) and Sepilok (Malaysia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Common Flangetail live in Khao Yai National Park?
Same order: Odonata
The closest relatives of the Common Flangetail that you can see in Khao Yai National Park (order Odonata, Dragonflies and Damselflies) are Plain Flashwing (about 40%), Russet Percher (about 40%) and Crimson Marsh Glider (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Flangetail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Flangetail is recorded against all the insects logged in Khao Yai National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.