What are the chances of seeing a Green-backed Twinspot in Kruger National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Green-backed Twinspot sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 457th most-seen of the 464 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green-backed Twinspot in Kruger National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Green-backed Twinspot in Kruger National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Green-backed Twinspot?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green-backed Twinspot sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kruger National Park the best place to see a Green-backed Twinspot?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Green-backed Twinspot sightings, Kruger National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in iSimangaliso Wetland Park (South Africa, about 10%), uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, under 5%) and Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Green-backed Twinspot live in Kruger National Park?
Same family: Estrildidae
The closest relatives of the Green-backed Twinspot that you can see in Kruger National Park (family Estrildidae, Waxbills and Allies) are Blue-breasted Cordonbleu (about 50%), Green-winged Pytilia (about 20%) and Red-billed Firefinch (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green-backed Twinspot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green-backed Twinspot is recorded against all the birds logged in Kruger National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.