What are the chances of seeing a Leaden Hairtail in Kruger National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Leaden Hairtail sighting in Kruger National Park on a given day, based on 149 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 22nd most-seen of the 748 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Leaden Hairtail in Kruger National Park?
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Leaden Hairtail in Kruger National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to October, the lowest months. That is one of Kruger National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 110 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Leaden Hairtail?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Leaden Hairtail sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kruger National Park the best place to see a Leaden Hairtail?
3rd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Leaden Hairtail sightings, Kruger National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 30%) and Hluhluwe-Imfolozi Park (South Africa, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Leaden Hairtail live in Kruger National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Leaden Hairtail that you can see in Kruger National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Axiocerses perion (about 10%), African Grass Blue (about 10%) and Common Hairstreak (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Leaden Hairtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Leaden Hairtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Kruger National Park (149 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.