What are the chances of seeing a Chortis Streamside Frog in Lago de Yojoa?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chortis Streamside Frog sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 8 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chortis Streamside Frog in Lago de Yojoa?
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Chortis Streamside Frog in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in March–May, August–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chortis Streamside Frog?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chortis Streamside Frog sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see a Chortis Streamside Frog?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Chortis Streamside Frog sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 10%) and Cusuco National Park (Honduras, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Chortis Streamside Frog live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same order: Anura
The closest relatives of the Chortis Streamside Frog that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (order Anura, Frogs and Toads) are Central American Gulf Coast Toad (about 30%), Mexican Smilisca (about 30%) and Highland Frog (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chortis Streamside Frog sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chortis Streamside Frog is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Lago de Yojoa (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.