Chezala brachypepla
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brisbane | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Chezala brachypepla sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 308th most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chezala brachypepla in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–September and November–January, the lowest months. Those are among Lamington National Park's wettest months, with about 160 mm of rain a month against 40 mm in August.
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chezala brachypepla sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Chezala brachypepla sightings, Lamington National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Same family: Oecophoridae
The closest relatives of the Chezala brachypepla that you can see in Lamington National Park (family Oecophoridae, Concealer Moths) are Enchronista proximella (about 10%), Catacometes phanozona (about 10%) and Delophanes anthracephala (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chezala brachypepla is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
