What are the chances of seeing a Garrha costimacula in Lamington National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Garrha costimacula sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 308th most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Garrha costimacula in Lamington National Park?
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Garrha costimacula in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–September and November–January, the lowest months. That is one of Lamington National Park's wettest months, with about 150 mm of rain against 40 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Garrha costimacula?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Garrha costimacula sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Lamington National Park the best place to see a Garrha costimacula?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Garrha costimacula sightings, Lamington National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Garrha costimacula live in Lamington National Park?
Same family: Oecophoridae
The closest relatives of the Garrha costimacula that you can see in Lamington National Park (family Oecophoridae, Concealer Moths) are Enchronista proximella (about 10%), Catacometes phanozona (about 10%) and Delophanes anthracephala (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Garrha costimacula sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Garrha costimacula is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.