What are the chances of seeing a Narrow-Banded Awl in Lamington National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Narrow-Banded Awl sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 89th most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Narrow-Banded Awl in Lamington National Park?
December to March
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Narrow-Banded Awl in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–June and August, the lowest months. Those are among Lamington National Park's wettest months, with about 150 mm of rain a month against 40 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Narrow-Banded Awl?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Narrow-Banded Awl sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lamington National Park the best place to see a Narrow-Banded Awl?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Narrow-Banded Awl sightings, Lamington National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Narrow-Banded Awl live in Lamington National Park?
Same family: Hesperiidae
The closest relatives of the Narrow-Banded Awl that you can see in Lamington National Park (family Hesperiidae, Skippers) are Splendid Ochre (about 30%), Wide-Brand Grass-Dart (about 20%) and Regent Skipper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Narrow-Banded Awl sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Narrow-Banded Awl is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (29 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.