What are the chances of seeing a Schistophleps albida in Lamington National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Schistophleps albida sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 131st most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Schistophleps albida in Lamington National Park?
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Schistophleps albida in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Schistophleps albida?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Schistophleps albida sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Lamington National Park the best place to see a Schistophleps albida?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Schistophleps albida sightings, Lamington National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Schistophleps albida live in Lamington National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Schistophleps albida that you can see in Lamington National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Asian Magpie Moth (about 20%), Triangles (about 20%) and Hypena gonospilalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Schistophleps albida sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Schistophleps albida is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.