What are the chances of seeing a Black-Tailed Darner in Los Quetzales National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-Tailed Darner sighting in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 56 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-Tailed Darner in Los Quetzales National Park?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-Tailed Darner in Los Quetzales National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–June and August–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-Tailed Darner?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-Tailed Darner sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Los Quetzales National Park the best place to see a Black-Tailed Darner?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Black-Tailed Darner sightings, Los Quetzales National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, under 5%) and La Amistad International Park (Panama) (Panama, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Black-Tailed Darner live in Los Quetzales National Park?
Same order: Odonata
The closest relatives of the Black-Tailed Darner that you can see in Los Quetzales National Park (order Odonata, Dragonflies and Damselflies) are Terira Dancer (about 10%) and Highland Rubyspot (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-Tailed Darner sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-Tailed Darner is recorded against all the insects logged in Los Quetzales National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.