What are the chances of seeing a Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant in Machalilla National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant sighting in Machalilla National Park on a given day, based on 251 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 16th most-seen of the 248 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant in Machalilla National Park?
May
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant in Machalilla National Park on a given day, against about 20% in June, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Machalilla National Park the best place to see a Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant sightings, Machalilla National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Podocarpus National Park (Ecuador, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant live in Machalilla National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant that you can see in Machalilla National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 40%), Southern Beardless-Tyrannulet (about 30%) and Baird's Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fulvous-headed Pygmy-Tyrant is recorded against all the birds logged in Machalilla National Park (251 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.