Omiodes croceiceps
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
Omiodes croceiceps is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Francis Walker in 1866. It is found in Brazil (Para, Amazonas, Ega), Peru, Panama and Costa Rica. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Main Ridge Forest Reserve | 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago | |
| 2 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Omiodes croceiceps sighting in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 296th most-seen of the 346 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Omiodes croceiceps in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in April–May and August–January, the lowest months. That is one of Main Ridge Forest Reserve's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain against 230 mm in October.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Omiodes croceiceps sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Omiodes croceiceps sightings, Main Ridge Forest Reserve has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Same genus: Omiodes
The closest relatives of the Omiodes croceiceps that you can see in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (genus Omiodes) are Omiodes humeralis (about 20%), Omiodes stigmosalis (about 20%) and Omiodes insolutalis (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Omiodes croceiceps is recorded against all the insects logged in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
