Omiodes insolutalis
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
Omiodes insolutalis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Heinrich Benno Möschler in 1890. It is found in Puerto Rico and Costa Rica. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Main Ridge Forest Reserve | 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Omiodes insolutalis sighting in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 163rd most-seen of the 346 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report an Omiodes insolutalis in Main Ridge Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in April, June and August–November, the lowest months. That is one of Main Ridge Forest Reserve's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain against 230 mm in October.
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Omiodes insolutalis sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Main Ridge Forest Reserve, in our data
Main Ridge Forest Reserve is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Omiodes insolutalis sightings: about 20% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same genus: Omiodes
The closest relatives of the Omiodes insolutalis that you can see in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (genus Omiodes) are Omiodes humeralis (about 20%), Omiodes stigmosalis (about 20%) and Omiodes croceiceps (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Omiodes insolutalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
