Araeomolis rhodographa
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Araeomolis rhodographa is a species of moth in the family Erebidae. It was described by George Hampson in 1901. It is found in French Guiana, Venezuela, Colombia, Bolivia, Panama, Suriname and the Brazilian state of Amazonas. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Araeomolis rhodographa sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 296th most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Araeomolis rhodographa in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April and August–January, the lowest months. That is one of Manu National Park's driest months, with about 70 mm of rain against 290 mm in February.
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Araeomolis rhodographa sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Only Manu National Park, in our data
Manu National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Araeomolis rhodographa sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Araeomolis rhodographa that you can see in Manu National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Paraethria flavosignata (about 20%), Walker's Moth (about 20%) and Emeraldine (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Araeomolis rhodographa is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
