Ceroctena amynta
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pico Bonito National Park | 🇭🇳 Honduras | |
| 2 | Serra dos Órgãos National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 3 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 4 | Braulio Carrillo National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 5 | Yasuní National Park | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | |
| 6 | Tambopata National Reserve | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 7 | Soberanía National Park | 🇵🇦 Panama | |
| 8 | Iguazú National Park | 🇦🇷 Argentina | |
| 9 | Iguaçu National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Emeraldine sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 31st most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Emeraldine in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, the lowest month.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Emeraldine sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
3rd of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Emeraldine sightings, Manu National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 30%) and Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Emeraldine that you can see in Manu National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Paraethria flavosignata (about 20%), Walker's Moth (about 20%) and Black Witch (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Emeraldine is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
