What are the chances of seeing a Johannes's Tody-Tyrant in Manu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Johannes's Tody-Tyrant sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 387 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 161st most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Johannes's Tody-Tyrant in Manu National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Johannes's Tody-Tyrant in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, the lowest month. That is one of Manu National Park's driest months, with about 90 mm of rain against 290 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Johannes's Tody-Tyrant?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Johannes's Tody-Tyrant sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Johannes's Tody-Tyrant?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Johannes's Tody-Tyrant sightings, Manu National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Johannes's Tody-Tyrant live in Manu National Park?
Same genus: Hemitriccus
The closest relatives of the Johannes's Tody-Tyrant that you can see in Manu National Park (genus Hemitriccus, Tody-Tyrants and Bamboo-Tyrants) are Flammulated Pygmy-Tyrant (about 10%) and White-bellied Tody-Tyrant (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Johannes's Tody-Tyrant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Johannes's Tody-Tyrant is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (387 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.