Ramphia albizona
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Ramphia is a monotypic moth genus of the family Noctuidae erected by Achille Guenée in 1852. Its only species, Ramphia albizona, was first described by Pierre André Latreille in 1817. It is found in equatorial South America. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Serra dos Órgãos National Park | 🇧🇷 Brazil | |
| 2 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ramphia albizona sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 203rd most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, March–April, August and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Ramphia albizona in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, May–July, September and December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ramphia albizona sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Ramphia albizona sightings, Manu National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Ramphia albizona that you can see in Manu National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Paraethria flavosignata (about 20%), Walker's Moth (about 20%) and Emeraldine (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ramphia albizona is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
