What are the chances of seeing a Cramer's Satyr in Manuel Antonio National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cramer's Satyr sighting in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 56th most-seen of the 69 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cramer's Satyr in Manuel Antonio National Park?
November
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cramer's Satyr in Manuel Antonio National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March–July and September–October, the lowest months. That is one of Manuel Antonio National Park's wettest months, with about 700 mm of rain against 35 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Cramer's Satyr?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cramer's Satyr sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manuel Antonio National Park the best place to see a Cramer's Satyr?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Cramer's Satyr sightings, Manuel Antonio National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Cramer's Satyr live in Manuel Antonio National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Cramer's Satyr that you can see in Manuel Antonio National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 30%), Hewitson's Longwing (about 20%) and Amathonte Morpho (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cramer's Satyr sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cramer's Satyr is recorded against all the insects logged in Manuel Antonio National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.