What are the chances of seeing an Autophila cataphanes in Mercantour National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Autophila cataphanes sighting in Mercantour National Park on a given day, based on 20 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 199th most-seen of the 412 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Autophila cataphanes in Mercantour National Park?
January and November
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report an Autophila cataphanes in Mercantour National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–July, September and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Autophila cataphanes?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Autophila cataphanes sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an Autophila cataphanes?
Only Mercantour National Park, in our data
Mercantour National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Autophila cataphanes sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Autophila cataphanes live in Mercantour National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Autophila cataphanes that you can see in Mercantour National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Burnet Companion (about 20%), Speckled Pellicle (about 20%) and Jersey Tiger (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Autophila cataphanes sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Autophila cataphanes is recorded against all the insects logged in Mercantour National Park (20 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.