What are the chances of seeing a Four-Spotted Footman in Mercantour National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Four-Spotted Footman sighting in Mercantour National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 272nd most-seen of the 412 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Four-Spotted Footman in Mercantour National Park?
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Four-Spotted Footman in Mercantour National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Four-Spotted Footman?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Four-Spotted Footman sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Mercantour National Park the best place to see a Four-Spotted Footman?
7th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Four-Spotted Footman sightings, Mercantour National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%), Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park (Spain, about 20%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Four-Spotted Footman live in Mercantour National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Four-Spotted Footman that you can see in Mercantour National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Burnet Companion (about 20%), Speckled Pellicle (about 20%) and Jersey Tiger (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Four-Spotted Footman sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Four-Spotted Footman is recorded against all the insects logged in Mercantour National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.