What are the chances of seeing a Tiny Cisticola in Meru National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Tiny Cisticola sighting in Meru National Park on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 106th most-seen of the 243 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tiny Cisticola in Meru National Park?
April
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Tiny Cisticola in Meru National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February–March, June, September–October and December, the lowest months. That is one of Meru National Park's wettest months, with about 190 mm of rain against almost none in July. May and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Tiny Cisticola?
Between midnight and 3 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tiny Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Meru National Park the best place to see a Tiny Cisticola?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Tiny Cisticola sightings, Meru National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Mkomazi National Park (Tanzania, about 30%) and Tsavo West National Park (Kenya, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Tiny Cisticola live in Meru National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Tiny Cisticola that you can see in Meru National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Ashy Cisticola (about 40%) and Zitting Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tiny Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tiny Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Meru National Park (29 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.