What are the chances of seeing a Winding Cisticola in Meru National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Winding Cisticola sighting in Meru National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 231st most-seen of the 243 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Winding Cisticola in Meru National Park?
February and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Winding Cisticola in Meru National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June, September and November–January, the lowest months. May and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Winding Cisticola?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Winding Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Meru National Park the best place to see a Winding Cisticola?
20th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Winding Cisticola sightings, Meru National Park ranks 20th at under 5%. The best odds are in Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 50%), Semuliki National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and Amboseli National Park (Kenya, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Winding Cisticola live in Meru National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Winding Cisticola that you can see in Meru National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Ashy Cisticola (about 40%), Tiny Cisticola (about 20%) and Zitting Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Winding Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Winding Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Meru National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.