Azochis trichotarsalis
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Azochis trichotarsalis is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by George Hampson in 1918. It is found in Venezuela. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Main Ridge Forest Reserve | 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago | |
| 2 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Azochis trichotarsalis sighting in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 412th most-seen of the 506 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, March, June and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Azochis trichotarsalis in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in February, April–May, July–October and December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Azochis trichotarsalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Azochis trichotarsalis sightings, Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 10%).
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Azochis trichotarsalis that you can see in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Cliniodes opalalis (about 20%), Desmia bajulalis (about 20%) and Mulberry Leaftier (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Azochis trichotarsalis is recorded against all the insects logged in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
