What are the chances of seeing an Eretris suzannae in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Eretris suzannae sighting in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 359th most-seen of the 506 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eretris suzannae in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve?
May–July, October and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eretris suzannae in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in January–April, August–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Eretris suzannae?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eretris suzannae sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Where else can you see an Eretris suzannae?
Only Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, in our data
Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Eretris suzannae sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Eretris suzannae live in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Eretris suzannae that you can see in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Common Morpho (about 30%), Clysonymus Longwing (about 30%) and Wide-Bordered Satyr (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eretris suzannae sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eretris suzannae is recorded against all the insects logged in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.