Saurita submacula
In 3 days ~10% in a week ~30%
Saurita submacula is a species of moth in the subfamily Arctiinae. It was first described by William Schaus in 1911. It is found in Costa Rica. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica |
More parks will be added in future updates.
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Saurita submacula sighting in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 412th most-seen of the 506 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January and September–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Saurita submacula in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in February–August and December, the lowest months. Those are among Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve's wettest months, with about 310 mm of rain a month against 45 mm in March.
Between 5 and 8 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Saurita submacula sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, in our data
Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Saurita submacula sightings: under 5% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Saurita submacula that you can see in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Symphlebia perflua (about 10%), Black Witch (about 10%) and Amastus aconia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Saurita submacula is recorded against all the insects logged in Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
