What are the chances of seeing a Long-tailed Sibia in Namdapha National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Long-tailed Sibia sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 533 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 22nd most-seen of the 298 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Long-tailed Sibia in Namdapha National Park?
January to March
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Long-tailed Sibia in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against about 20% in October and December, the lowest months. Those are among Namdapha National Park's driest months, with about 90 mm of rain a month against 660 mm in July. June to September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Long-tailed Sibia?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Long-tailed Sibia sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see a Long-tailed Sibia?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Long-tailed Sibia sightings, Namdapha National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 10%) and Kerinci Seblat National Park (Indonesia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Long-tailed Sibia live in Namdapha National Park?
Same genus: Heterophasia
The closest relatives of the Long-tailed Sibia that you can see in Namdapha National Park (genus Heterophasia, Sibias) are Rufous-backed Sibia (about 20%) and Beautiful Sibia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Long-tailed Sibia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Long-tailed Sibia is recorded against all the birds logged in Namdapha National Park (533 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.