Alcippe rufogularis
Silhouette: PhyloPic
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
The rufous-throated fulvetta (Schoeniparus rufogularis) is a species of bird in the family Pellorneidae. It is found in southeastern Asia from the Himalayas through Indochina to southwestern Cambodia. Its natural habitat is subtropical or tropical moist lowland forest.
Collar, N. J. & Robson, C. 2007. Family Timaliidae (Babblers) pp. 70 – 291 in; del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Christie, D.A. eds. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 12. Picathartes to Tits and Chickadees. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cuc Phuong National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 2 | Namdapha National Park | 🇮🇳 India |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-throated Fulvetta sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 270 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 63rd most-seen of the 298 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, March and May
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-throated Fulvetta in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April, October and December, the lowest months. June to September have too few records to rate.
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-throated Fulvetta sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Rufous-throated Fulvetta sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 50%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-throated Fulvetta is recorded against all the birds logged in Namdapha National Park (270 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
