What are the chances of seeing a Black-throated Apalis in Nyungwe National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-throated Apalis sighting in Nyungwe National Park on a given day, based on 451 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 33rd most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-throated Apalis in Nyungwe National Park?
December
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Black-throated Apalis in Nyungwe National Park on a given day, against about 20% in February–March, May and August, the lowest months. That is one of Nyungwe National Park's wettest months, with about 550 mm of rain against 30 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Black-throated Apalis?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-throated Apalis sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Nyungwe National Park the best place to see a Black-throated Apalis?
2nd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Black-throated Apalis sightings, Nyungwe National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%. The best odds are in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Black-throated Apalis live in Nyungwe National Park?
Same genus: Apalis
The closest relatives of the Black-throated Apalis that you can see in Nyungwe National Park (genus Apalis, Apalises) are Black-faced Apalis (about 50%), Chestnut-throated Apalis (about 30%) and Gray Apalis (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-throated Apalis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-throated Apalis is recorded against all the birds logged in Nyungwe National Park (451 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.