What are the chances of seeing a White-Banded Satyr in Pico Bonito National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a White-Banded Satyr sighting in Pico Bonito National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 23rd most-seen of the 33 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-Banded Satyr in Pico Bonito National Park?
February and August
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a White-Banded Satyr in Pico Bonito National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–July and October–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White-Banded Satyr?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-Banded Satyr sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pico Bonito National Park the best place to see a White-Banded Satyr?
Yes
Of the 9 parks where we can rate White-Banded Satyr sightings, Pico Bonito National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 20%) and Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 20%).
Which relatives of the White-Banded Satyr live in Pico Bonito National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the White-Banded Satyr that you can see in Pico Bonito National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Common Morpho (about 40%), Pale Owl-Butterfly (about 40%) and Ismenius Tiger (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-Banded Satyr sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-Banded Satyr is recorded against all the insects logged in Pico Bonito National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.