What are the chances of seeing a Pseudochelidura sinuata in Pyrénées National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pseudochelidura sinuata sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 521st most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pseudochelidura sinuata in Pyrénées National Park?
March–June and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pseudochelidura sinuata in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pseudochelidura sinuata?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pseudochelidura sinuata sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Where else can you see a Pseudochelidura sinuata?
Only Pyrénées National Park, in our data
Pyrénées National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Pseudochelidura sinuata sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Which relatives of the Pseudochelidura sinuata live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same family: Forficulidae
The closest relatives of the Pseudochelidura sinuata that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (family Forficulidae, Common Earwigs) are Chelidura pyrenaica (about 10%) and Anechura bipunctata (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pseudochelidura sinuata sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pseudochelidura sinuata is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.