Tharsalea heteronea
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grand Teton National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Glacier National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 3 | Yellowstone National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | Grand Canyon National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 5 | Rocky Mountain National Park | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 6 | Yosemite National Park | 🇺🇸 United States |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Copper sighting in Rocky Mountain National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 63rd most-seen of the 191 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue Copper in Rocky Mountain National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to June, the lowest months. That is one of Rocky Mountain National Park's wettest months, with about 95 mm of rain against 40 mm in September.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue Copper sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Blue Copper sightings, Rocky Mountain National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Grand Teton National Park (United States, about 20%), Glacier National Park (United States, about 20%) and Yellowstone National Park (United States, about 10%).
Same genus: Tharsalea
The closest relatives of the Blue Copper that you can see in Rocky Mountain National Park (genus Tharsalea) are Dorcas Copper (about 10%) and Ruddy Copper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue Copper is recorded against all the insects logged in Rocky Mountain National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
