Northern Giant Petrel

Northern Giant Petrel

Macronectes halli

Silhouette: Alexandre Vong · PhyloPic

LCLeast ConcernNTVUENCR
Daily sighting probability <5% · Rare
at Royal National Park

In 3 days <5%

6 Verified sightings at Royal National Park From 2019 to 2026
278 In all 7 parks
June Best month
☀️ Diurnal When it's spotted

About the Northern Giant Petrel

The northern giant petrel (Macronectes halli), also known as Hall's giant petrel, is a large, predatory seabird of the southern oceans. Its range overlaps broadly with the range of the related southern giant petrel (Macronectes giganteus), albeit slightly further to the north.

The northern giant petrel was formally described in 1912 by the Australian born ornithologist Gregory Mathews as a subspecies of the southern giant petrel with the trinomial name Macronectes giganteus halli. The specific epithet halli was chosen to honour the Australian ornithologist Robert Hall who had described the birds breeding on the Kerguelen Islands. The northern giant petrel is now considered to be a separate species and has the binomial name Macronectes halli. It is monotypic: no subspecies are recognised. The genus name combines the Ancient Greek makros meaning "great" and nēktēs meaning "swimmer". The name "petrel" refers to the Biblical account of Saint Peter walking on water, referring to the way these birds run on top of the water as they are getting airborne.

The two giant petrel species make up the genus Macronectes. They belong to the order Procellariiformes, the tube-nosed seabirds... Wikipedia →

Sounds

Alarm call1:30

New Zealand · 2017

© David Boyle · XC927079 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Call0:26

France · 2020

© Hichem MACHOUK · XC623852 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Call1:06

United Kingdom · 2015

© Andrew Spencer · XC254065 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Global Distribution

Parks Where Found

# Park Country Daily sighting probability
1 Península Valdés 🇦🇷 Argentina
~20%
2 Rakiura National Park 🇳🇿 New Zealand
<5%
3 Tierra del Fuego National Park 🇦🇷 Argentina
<5%
4 Fiordland National Park 🇳🇿 New Zealand
<5%
5 Table Mountain National Park 🇿🇦 South Africa
<5%
6 West Coast National Park 🇿🇦 South Africa
<5%
7 Royal National Park 🇦🇺 Australia
<5%

Cities Where Found

# City Country Daily sighting probability
1 Montevideo 🇺🇾 Uruguay
<5%
2 Sydney 🇦🇺 Australia
<5%

Zoos & Centres Where Found

# Zoo / Centre Country
1 Willowbank Wildlife Reserve 🇳🇿 New Zealand In captivity

Before you go

What are the chances of seeing a Northern Giant Petrel in Royal National Park?

Rare

Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Giant Petrel sighting in Royal National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 174th most-seen of the 178 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.

When is the best time to see a Northern Giant Petrel in Royal National Park?

Any time of year

In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Northern Giant Petrel in Royal National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.

What time of day is best to see a Northern Giant Petrel?

Between 9 am and noon

Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Northern Giant Petrel sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.

Is Royal National Park the best place to see a Northern Giant Petrel?

7th of 7

Of the 7 parks where we can rate Northern Giant Petrel sightings, Royal National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Península Valdés (Argentina, about 20%), Rakiura National Park (New Zealand, under 5%) and Tierra del Fuego National Park (Argentina, under 5%).

Where does the Northern Giant Petrel sighting chance come from?

GBIF citizen-science records

It is estimated from how often the Northern Giant Petrel is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.

← Back to Royal National Park