Platagarista macleayi
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Platagarista is a monotypic moth genus of the family Noctuidae erected by Karl Jordan in 1912. Its only species, Platagarista macleayi, or Macleay's day-moth, was first described by William Sharp Macleay in 1864. It is found in the Australian states of Queensland and New South Wales. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royal National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Platagarista macleayi sighting in Royal National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 147th most-seen of the 175 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February and September–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Platagarista macleayi in Royal National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–August and December–January, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Platagarista macleayi sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Platagarista macleayi sightings, Royal National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Platagarista macleayi that you can see in Royal National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Lily Caterpillar Moth (about 10%), Australian Grapevine Moth (about 10%) and Common Whistling Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Platagarista macleayi is recorded against all the insects logged in Royal National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
