What are the chances of seeing a Black-necked Weaver in Ruaha National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Weaver sighting in Ruaha National Park on a given day, based on 26 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 138th most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-necked Weaver in Ruaha National Park?
July, September and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Weaver in Ruaha National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January–June, August and October–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-necked Weaver?
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-necked Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ruaha National Park the best place to see a Black-necked Weaver?
5th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Black-necked Weaver sightings, Ruaha National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kibale National Park (Uganda, about 40%), Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and Mkomazi National Park (Tanzania, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Black-necked Weaver live in Ruaha National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Black-necked Weaver that you can see in Ruaha National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Golden-backed Weaver (about 10%), Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 10%) and Vitelline Masked-Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-necked Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-necked Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Ruaha National Park (26 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.