What are the chances of seeing a Grey Junglefowl in Satpura National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Junglefowl sighting in Satpura National Park on a given day, based on 466 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 259 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey Junglefowl in Satpura National Park?
April and May
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Junglefowl in Satpura National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January, the lowest month. Those are among Satpura National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain a month against 690 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Grey Junglefowl?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey Junglefowl sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Satpura National Park the best place to see a Grey Junglefowl?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Grey Junglefowl sightings, Satpura National Park ranks 5th at about 40%. The best odds are in Periyar National Park (India, about 60%), Nagarhole National Park (India, about 50%) and Bandipur National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Grey Junglefowl live in Satpura National Park?
Same family: Phasianidae
The closest relatives of the Grey Junglefowl that you can see in Satpura National Park (family Phasianidae, Pheasants, Grouse, and Allies) are Common Peafowl (about 60%), Grey Francolin (about 20%) and Red Spurfowl (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey Junglefowl sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey Junglefowl is recorded against all the birds logged in Satpura National Park (466 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.