What are the chances of seeing a Rock-loving Cisticola in Serengeti National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rock-loving Cisticola sighting in Serengeti National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 447th most-seen of the 469 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rock-loving Cisticola in Serengeti National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rock-loving Cisticola in Serengeti National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Rock-loving Cisticola?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rock-loving Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serengeti National Park the best place to see a Rock-loving Cisticola?
7th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Rock-loving Cisticola sightings, Serengeti National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Golden Gate Highlands National Park (South Africa, about 10%), Addo Elephant National Park (South Africa, about 10%) and Hluhluwe-Imfolozi Park (South Africa, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Rock-loving Cisticola live in Serengeti National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Rock-loving Cisticola that you can see in Serengeti National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Rattling Cisticola (about 50%), Zitting Cisticola (about 20%) and Winding Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rock-loving Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rock-loving Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Serengeti National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.