What are the chances of seeing an Idaea eugeniata in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Idaea eugeniata sighting in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 244th most-seen of the 597 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Idaea eugeniata in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
May–July and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Idaea eugeniata in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August and October–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Idaea eugeniata?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Idaea eugeniata sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Sierra de Guadarrama National Park the best place to see an Idaea eugeniata?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Idaea eugeniata sightings, Sierra de Guadarrama National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Idaea eugeniata live in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Same genus: Idaea
The closest relatives of the Idaea eugeniata that you can see in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (genus Idaea) are Portland Ribbon Wave (about 10%), Idaea ostrinaria (about 10%) and Bright Wave (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Idaea eugeniata sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Idaea eugeniata is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.